RE: Informace o deb baliku
To |
czdebian-l zavinac debian bod cz |
From |
Kotrla Vitezslav <kotrla zavinac ceb bod cz> |
Date |
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:24:19 +0200 |
Mozna jsem spatne pochopil Vas problem, ale vzpominam si, ze Adrian
Bunk pise o svem systemu oznacovani balicku:
<citace>
When I had to recompile a package I have decreased the last digit of
the package version by one and added a ".bunk", e.g.
3.1.0a-2 -> 3.1.0a-1.bunk
to mark that these packages aren't the official ones but packages
I've recompiled. When you'll upgrade your distribution to Debian 3.1
you'll get the official packages installed instead.
</citace>
Vizte http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/packages/
Vitezslav Kotrla
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vladimir Smelhaus [mailto:smelhaus zavinac bpt bod cz]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:05 AM
> To: czdebian-l zavinac debian bod cz
> Subject: Re: Informace o deb baliku
>
>
> On 25 Aug 2003, 15:19, Jakub Morávek wrote:
>
> > > Da se nejak zjistit z deb baliku informace o tom, kde byl
> dany balik
> > > sestaven? Neco jako
> > >
> > > rpm -qa --queryformat "%{NAME}\t%{BUILDHOST}\n"
>
> > Kouknete se na http://root.cz Je tam clanek o
> balickovacim systemu
> > Debianu. Mozna Vam pomuze prave tohle:
> http://www.root.cz/clanek/1790
>
> To mi bohuzel nepomuze.
>
> Musim si odpovedet sam. Zkratka to nejde, coz me mrzi.
>
> Jak odlisit odnekud stazeny deb balik od baliku sestaveneho na mem
> pocitaci ze stejnych sources jako je ten predchozi (odnekud stazeny)?
> Kdyz na ty sources ani nesahnu a pouze necham sestavit deb, tak
> ziskam balik s uplne stejnym oznacenim jako ten puvodni, ale muze mit
> jine zavislosti - s oblibou treba glibc.
>
> V.
Partial thread listing:
- RE: Informace o deb baliku, (pokračuje)
2.4.22-rc2+HTB+patchnute iproute2=RTNETLINK ANSWERS: Invalid argument
Marek Brazina